|
|
Grasslands, meadows
and pasture habitat audit |
|
DOWNLOAD THE FULL AUDIT: in pdf
or text format
This
audit covers areas of unimproved and semi-improved neutral grassland.
Traditionally, neutral grasslands were managed as hay meadows
or pasture, but today these terms are used rather loosely to
describe a variety of grassland types. Generally pastures are
grazed for most or all of the year, whilst meadows are allowed
to grow through spring and early summer and are then cut during
June and July - the cuttings being dried and removed for hay.
In London many grasslands may also be managed for informal recreation
or as playing fields.
Although the area of neutral grassland has been considerably
reduced over the years, it is still relatively widespread throughout
London and is a significant habitat type in many outer London
Boroughs. The City of London is the only borough that does not
have any significant areas of neutral grassland. There are approximately
11,000 hectares of neutral grassland in London - a considerable
area when compared with the meagre acid grassland resource of
just 1,200 hectares.
It has been suggested that the loss of neutral grasslands in
the lowlands represents the greatest reduction of wildlife habitat
over the last 45 years. Between 1930 and 1984 semi-natural lowland
grassland decreased by an estimated 97 in England and Wales,
leaving just 3 undamaged by intensification. The extent and
quality of the neutral grassland in London has shown a similar
decline. Although neutral grasslands are still relatively common
in London, unimproved (species-rich) neutral grasslands are
particularly rare. This habitat is a high priority for action
due to the severe decline in quantity and quality of this habitat
nationally and the relatively large neutral grassland resource
found within London.
Several areas of relatively species-rich neutral grassland could
be restored by relaxation of mowing regimes in some of London's
older public parks and open spaces. Relaxation or modification
of mowing regimes should be implemented after thorough survey
to ensure that the areas that revert to a more natural sward
are the most species-rich areas. Uncut areas of perennial ryegrass
(the typical constituent of amenity swards) are of little value
to people or wildlife. Rough grassland has already been restored
in parts of some London parks with very beneficial results.
The restoration of a sympathetic grazing regime would be particularly
beneficial to many neutral grassland sites. Although the botanical
interest of several good quality grasslands in London is maintained
by mowing or hay-making this is not usually the most beneficial
management technique for biodiversity generally. Grazing is
a more subtle form of management and creates a much wider range
of micro-habitats which can be exploited by invertebrates and
plant species which need gaps in the sward.
This is only a summary - download
the full audit in pdf
or text format
Related documents: None
Back to top of page
|
|