|
|
Woodland habitat audit |
|
DOWNLOAD THE FULL AUDIT: in pdf
or text format
This audit includes
all semi-natural plant communities dominated by trees or shrubs.
Although there are a few intermediate habitats, the dominance
of woody species generally distinguishes woodland and scrub
from grasslands and marshes. London's better woodlands have
been described before, but this audit can take account of
more recent information on both the woodlands and their community
types, provide borough by borough statistics and identify
the issues that will need to be addressed in action for London's
woodlands and scrub.
There is no doubt that
London was very largely clothed in woodland before the activities
of man induced the other ancient habitats. Even nowadays,
after millennia of management, the composition of the ground
flora of the older woodlands is derived from this wildwood.
But there have been many losses, and the composition of woodland
canopies more reflects their long history of management, so
that species like hornbeam, sweet chestnut, field maple and
hazel are more abundant than they would be naturally.
Many wet woodlands have
a dense structure, often with fallen trees, difficult ground
conditions and mosquitoes. This makes them more difficult
to enjoy and so less appreciated by the public than 'bluebell
woods'. They are threatened with changes in the water regime
through drainage or flood control work, succession to drier
habitat and toxic water pollutants/ The tradition of pond
maintenance to arrest succession to wet woodland prevents
the development of many small wet woodlands.
There has been a national
drive for woodland planting, manifest in and around London
in the Watling and Thames Chase projects. The aims of these
projects extend far beyond biodiversity conservation, but
they provide an excellent basis for the development of new
woodlands for people to enjoy. There are also less obvious
opportunities, such as allowing wetlands to develop into wet
woodland through natural succession, which would be appropriate
in disused mineral workings. Tree planting can, however, cause
harm to nature conservaton, as trees shade out other valuable
plant communities in grassland, heath, wasteland or marsh.
It is vital therefore that new woodland planting is undertaken
only after survey of the existing plant communitiy confirms
that it is of no species value for nature conservation.
This is only a summary - download
the full audit in pdf
or text format
Related documents:
• Woodland
habitat action plan
Back to top of page
|
|