|
|
Open landscapes
with ancient/old trees
habitat audit |
|
DOWNLOAD THE FULL AUDIT: in pdf
or text format
This audit includes the following habitats: deer parks, wood
pasture, other areas of unimproved grassland with scattered
old trees (usually oak). Old, mostly 19th century landscaped
parklands are also included where these appear to have been
superimposed on former wood pasture or deer parks. These habitats
are derived from medieval forests, wooded commons, parks and
pastures with trees in them. Subsequently, some had a designed
landscape superimposed; usually during the 19th century. Defunct
wood pasture is found where the traditional management of stock
grazing is no longer practiced and where the trees are no longer
pollarded to provide timber or fodder. They may include a landscape
history of commoners' rights and forest rights. A typical example
is Epping Forest. Parklands are the typical open landscapes
with scattered trees. They may include a history of having been
enclosed and managed as deer parks, Royal hunting grounds or
formal public and private open landscapes.
The major threat to
open landscapes with ancient/old trees is the cessation of
traditional management, particularly grazing. Most sites in
London are no longer managed in this way although deer still
graze Richmond Park and Bushy Park. The remainder of this
habitat in London is maintained by mowing, which is a much
less sympathetic management regime. In addition to the lack
of grazing, many mature parkland trees are managed inappropriately
from a nature conservation point of view, by the removal dead
and decaying limbs and the clearance of fallen or standing
dead wood.
Open landscapes with ancient/old trees are, by definition,
habitats with a well-established presence in the landscape.
This is itself a threat to their survival as it is often forgotten
that they are essentially human-created landscapes that need
to be maintained by human intervention. New generations of
trees need to be planted (or naturally regenerating saplings
protected from mowing or grazing) as long-term replacements
for extant mature specimens. Poor management of these sites
is linked with a poor understanding of their nature conservation
value and a concern for public safety. There is a widespread
and mistaken belief that dead wood is bad for the tree and
a public hazard.
A less obvious threat, but one which may adversely affect
the diversity of sensitive species such as lichens and fungi
living on the mature trees, is air pollution. It is well known
that many lichen species are sensitive to air pollution and
their loss, or failure to re-establish themselves, may have
unforeseen consequences for a wider range of species which
may be dependent upon the lichen communities.
Most of the resource in London lies within areas of protected
open space. However, this does not necessarily ensure effective
nature conservation management, as the protection is aimed
mainly at maintaining the recreational and aesthetic attributes
of habitat. However, under the auspices of the Veteran Trees
Initiative, better management of ancient and old trees for
nature conservation is being promoted. A number of sites around
London provide examples of successful re-introduction of pollarding,
planting of replacement trees, and resumption of grazing management.
These techniques could be readily translated to sites within
London.
The old parklands in London are among the most popular places
visited by Londoners and tourists alike. Most informal recreational
activity is compatible with maintaining the nature conservation
of these sites and, therefore, there are opportunities for
raising awareness about park management that integrates biodiversity
conservation, landscape maintenance and recreational demand.
Awareness-raising programmes could focus on the conservation
work for some high-profile species such as the stag beetle,
bats and woodpeckers.
This is only a summary - download
the full audit in pdf
or text format
Related documents: None
Back to top of page
|
|