Menu:
Home
Up
PB060301
PB Agenda
PB190601
PBTOR
PBmins031001
PBmins140502
PBmins260303
PBmins250603
PBmins101003
|
| |
|
Project
Board
Minutes
March 6, 2001
Greater London Authority
- Present: James Farrell (GLA
chair), Ralph Gaines
(LWT), Peter Massini (EN), Andy Tomczynski (Thames Water), Esther
Collis (Project Officer), Steve Gilbert (RSPB). Apologies:
Alister Hayes (LB Bromley and London Borough Biodiversity Forum).
2. Project Officer funding.
Bridge House Funding for the Project Officer runs out 31 December
2001. The Steering Group asked the board to consider options
for further funding. Various suggestions were made and individuals
asked to follow them up asap.
|
Esm½e
Fairburn Trust. Action: EC to follow up and speak to RSPB.
|
|
London
Borough Grant Scheme. Action: JF to follow up with Chris
Lee at Association of London Government (ALG).
|
|
GLA
grants. Action: JF to investigate. |
|
Environmental
Action Fund. Action: EC to investigate.
|
|
Other
grants. Action: EC to investigate via GLA and borough contacts.
|
|
Co-funding
by Partners and potential charitable status. This was a suggestion
at the Steering Group on 9 October 2000. Should be explored
seriously if no progress is made with the above grants. English
Nature could potentially cover the bridging period (Jan
Mar 2002) between the end of Bridge House finds and the start
of the next financial year. Care would have to taken that
any new charity adds to, rather than competes with, funding
opportunities for conservation in London. Any Partnership
application that has these implications should contain a clear
statement of the desire to avoid conflict
and there should
be consultation with relevant partners before an application
is made. The Project Board agreed to invite Caroline Davis
(Thames Estuary Partnership) to talk about this issue. Action:
EC to invite Caroline Davis to next Project Board.
|
|
London
First. Possibility of assisting with a bridging period or
in establishing charitable status. Action: JF, EC and AT
to raise with London First Sustainability Unit (7 March 2001).
|
|
Action:
All to let JF and EC know of other possibilities asap.
|
- Structure of the Partnership.
There were no major comments on the structure of the Partnership.
The Board looked at the potential membership of the various
working groups and considered potential overlaps
individuals
that may be involved in more than one group.
|
RSPB
would chair the Management Working Group and set up the first
meeting. |
|
The
following would be invited to the first full meeting of the
Project Board: |
Peter Massini (English Nature), Andy Tomczynski (Thames Water),
Ralph Gaines (LWT), Steve Gilbert (RSPB), James Farrell (GLA),
Chris Lee (ALG), Richard Bullock (WWT), the chairs of the Habitats,
Records and Communications Working Groups, 2 representatives
of the London Borough Biodiversity Forum (probably Alister Hayes
and Doug Napier). This makes 12
suggested by the maximum.
Action: EC to set up meeting.
Previous Steering Group members would be reminded once more
by email of the opportunity to take part. Action: EC
4. Open Places and Protocols.
The Project Board recommends that:
|
2
open places are offered at every meeting of every working
group including the Project Board. These are open to anyone
with an interest in a particular agenda item or the process
generally. |
|
Chairs
are responsible for getting a meeting agenda to EC 2 weeks
in advance of a meeting so it can be put on the web. Action:
Chairs |
|
Interested
individuals must contact the chair in advance of a meeting
and places will be available on a first-come-first-served
basis. |
|
Chairs
are responsible for arranging meeting dates will in advance
so they can be advertised on the web, through the Project
Officer and via other partners. A suggested meeting timetable
is below. Action: Chairs. |
|
As
suggested in the Project Board Forward Plan and agreed by
the Steering Group at the last meeting, questions from interested
parties may be submitted to working groups. It will be the
chairs responsibility to ensure that the group gives a full
answer. Action: Chairs. |
5. Dates of Partnership meetings.
The Project Board suggests the following framework for Partnership
meetings in 2001:
Project Board
|
6 March
|
MWG
|
March
|
CWG
|
March
|
HSWG
|
June
|
CWG
|
June
|
MWG
|
June
|
Project Board
|
19 June
|
Partnership Forum
|
July
|
HSWG
|
September
|
CWG
|
September
|
MWG
|
September
|
Project Board
|
October
|
AGM
|
December
|
The Partnerships Forum meeting in July was discussed. The
Board considered that a short days event that focussed on discussing
practical and positive examples of implementation of the London
Biodiversity Action Plan would be very useful. The Project Officer
is to be the contact point for developing the event, and she
may pull together an event working group if necessary. Action:
EC
6. Memorandum of Agreement and Supporters
Pledge
The Management Working Group should establish a MOA asap. A
draft should be sent to previous Steering Group members for
agreement before it is finalised. The Management Working Group
should also draft a Supporters Pledge, which the Communications
Working Group should finalise. Action: SG and Management
Working Group, Communications Working Group
7. A.O.B.
|
The
Government response to the Environment, Transport and Regional
Affairs Committee Report on UK Biodiversity is due in the
next few days/weeks. The Report contained major recommendations
relevant to London biodiversity including the funding of Local
Authority biodiversity officers. |
|
UCLs
Environment & Society Research Unit, led by Carolyn Harrison,
is holding a practitioners workshop on brownfield development
and biodiversity at the end of March. She is looking for interested
attendees, particularly in planning, local government, development,
landscape architecture, architecture, engineering, construction
etc. Please spread the word and email contacts to JF or [email protected]
|
Date of Next Meeting.
19 June 2001, 1030. Venue to be confirmed.
Home
|
|
| |
|