|
Management Working Group
minutes
12 June 2001
25 September 2001
04 March 2003
22 July 2003
Agenda 4 September
2003
04 September 2003
22 October 2003
03 February 2004
Minutes of March 04, 2003
London Wildlife Trust offices 10.30am
Present:
James Farrell - Greater London Authority
Peter Massini - English Nature
William Moreno - London Biodiversity Partnership
Doug Napier - Community Initiative Partnership, Hounslow borough
Jenny Scholfield - London Wildlife Trust (chair and notetaker)
AGENDA
1. Function and structure of management working group
It was agreed that the existing terms of reference that state
the purpose of the Management Working Group were satisfactory.
DN reported that the London Boroughs Biodiversity Forum had
agreed that Andrew Bedford (L.B. Islington) would replace
DN as a representative on the working group. This was agreed
by the group.
The group discussed the current size of the working group
- all members were present - and agreed that the chair would
invite Chris Lee (Environment Policy, Association of London
Government), Jeremy Martin (Government Office for London)
and Tim Chapple (Thames Estuary Partnership) to join the group.
2. Terms of reference for working groups, with new
membership guidelines.
It was agreed that all working groups should set their terms
of reference. Partnership membership guidelines for all working
groups should also be applied. This proposal will be taken
to the next project board meeting for their approval (proposed
membership guidelines attached).
The need for specific guidelines for project board membership
was also identified, and a proposal will to be taken to the
next project board meeting for approval.
Chair to distribute proposed guidelines to other working group
chairs for discussion at next chairs meeting.
3. Funding group and business plan group
Both the funding strategy group and the business plan group
were set up last year as additional but temporary subgroups
to the Partnership structure. Clear lines of reporting now
need to be reestablished. The lead of the funding group will
report to the management working group, and the lead of the
business plan group will report to the project board.
4. Progress of funding strategy
The following comments on the draft funding strategy - 'Meeting
the cost' were made by the group;
i. the actions table should be a key element
of the document
ii. the summary for each action plan should
be no longer than 1 A4 page with achievable and stand-alone
relevant projects (and indication of costs)
iii. strategy document should be in form
of colour pamphlet with loose sheets for individual haps and
saps that can then be updated as necessary.
iv. funding for the production of the document
needs to be identified.
5. Project Officers report / issues
William's report is attached to these notes.
6. Three year review of action plans - establishing
the process
A 3 year review of the existing SAPs and HAPs will be due
in December 2003. Some SAP and HAP working groups have already
updated original actions, including change of target dates
and identifying new actions. Whilst these changes reflect
the new agendas identified by species and habitat working
groups, this situation will make a 3 year review difficult.
It was proposed that Species, Habitats and Data working group
establish a procedure and timetable for reviewing action plans.
Emerging changes would then be 'adopted' in 2004 as a result
of the review process.
There was some concern from the group that suggestions for
new species and habitat action plans did not link to the original
audit.
7. AOB
LBP budget - it was suggested that unallocated money in the
budget should be spent on 2 discreet projects, development
of the website, and a marketing project to identify action
plan champions within the business sector.
London Sustainability Exchange JF has had initial contact
with this relatively new organisation - 5 year funding from
Bridge House Estate fund. They may develop into a host organisation
for partnerships. JF to invite their chief executive to a
business plan group for further consideration.
Next meeting
The date of next meeting will be set once the project board
has set its annual timetable.
Back to top
|
|