1. Chairs Welcome and Introduction
David Goode welcomed everyone to the meeting especially new representatives
Caroline Davis and Ian Mather. It was noted that Chris Skinner
would be replacing Steve Gilbert in future meetings of the Steering
Group.
2. Apologies
Apologies were received from Tim Hill (LVRPA), Jeremy Dagley
(Corporation of London) and Mike Manuel (British Waterways).
3. Minutes of the Last Meeting (10 November 1999)
Ruth Day wished to correct Item 8 … it was her intention to talk
to the Habitats, Species and Data Topic Group about site definitions,
not Intellectual Property Rights.
4. Matters Arising and Action Points
No matters arising.
Action Points:
Involvement of the Environment Agency. David Goode was
to have written to the EA, encouraging their involvement throughout
the action planning process. Caroline Davis stated that she had
written to EA and will share her findings with David Goode. Action
CD
5. Report of the Communications Topic Group
In the absence of Paul Outhwaite, Steve Gilbert presented the
written report of the last meeting (17 November 1999).
6. Report from Habitats, Species and Data Topic Group (HS&D
TG)
Paul Sinnadurai presented the written report of the last meeting
(8 December 1999). He described the process of prioritising habitats
and species. The list of Species Action Plans and Statements presented
to the Steering Group is based on habitat affinity and specialist
requirements. Lists of initial contacts for the plans have been
drawn up.
Paul Sinnadurai pointed out the need for increased support for
the Project Officer, which should come from the Topic Group and
the Partnership as a whole. There is a September deadline for
draft Action Plans. He pointed out the great expectation on the
Partnership now that the Audit was published.
Paul Sinnadurai suggested that the Partners feed ideas for Action
Plan facilitators/support and other resources to the Project Officer.
Action All
Alister Hayes suggested that the boroughs could provide venues
for the Action Plan workshops/meetings.
Ruth Day pointed out that some meetings would have to be held
in the evenings so all could attend.
7. Report of Project Board
Niall Machin presented the written report of the last meeting
(18 January 1999). There were 3 recommendations.
- This recommendation was approved with a slight amendment.
'That the Communications Topic Group has the authority
to act on media, promotional and educational opportunities
without the need for Steering Group approval, via liaison
with the Project Officer and/or relevant members of the Partnership.å
- The proposed list of species and 'first round habitatså
was approved, with the addition of house sparrow to the Species
Action Plans.
- The Project Officer was given endorsement to progress the
creation of a Partnership website.
Niall Machin congratulated the Project Officer on a successful
launch event. He described the need to apply for a further yearås
funding from the Bridge House Estates Trust Fund.
Alister Hayes described progress on the London Borough Biodiversity
Forum. Each of the 4 sectors planned to meet before April 2000,
and each could send a representative to Steering Group meetings.
There could also be an annual meeting of all officers on the Forum.
David Goode welcomed borough representation and it was agreed
that the 4 representatives would attend in future.
- Project Officerås Report
The Project Officer presented his report and called for Partners
to publicise the Audit and other work through in-house publications.
9. Financial Report
David Goode asked for the submitted financial report to record
Partnership income more clearly. Action JF
10. A Partnership Website
See 7iii.
11. Cracking the Cultural Code … A consultation paper
Alister Hayes presented this consultation paper, drafted with
Mathew Frith of London Wildlife Trust. It arose from comments
made by the Partnership and at the London Biodiversity Conference.
The paper was not intended to be a criticism of the Partnershipås
work but rather a stimulus for a more holistic approach and wider
Partnership.
There was a general discussion which raised the need to find
new ways of promoting conservation to the public, perhaps involving
a more professional marketing push. Case studies were felt to
be important and the value of promoting current work was raised.
Links were made to the future work of the GLA and its functional
bodies.
Alister Hayes agreed to progress the cultural links paper with
others including Ian Mather.
- A.O.B.
Leo Batten pointed out that his comments on the Audit were
not in the final version. James Farrell to check which version
was published. Action JF.
Mike Fitt mentioned the forthcoming declaration of Richmond
Park National Nature Reserve on 14 May.
David Goode thanked Paul Sinnadurai for all his work in the
Partnership and wished him well in his new job.
- Date of Next Meeting
To be decided.
Amended Financial Report
London Biodiversity Partnership Accounts 1.1.99 … 31.12.99